<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Anthony Flew&#8217;s &#8220;There Is A God: How the world&#8217;s most notorious atheist changed his mind&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orthodoxharlemite.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/review-of-anthony-flews-there-is-a-god-how-the-worlds-most-notorious-atheist-changed-his-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orthodoxharlemite.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/review-of-anthony-flews-there-is-a-god-how-the-worlds-most-notorious-atheist-changed-his-mind/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from an Eastern Orthodox, Harlemite living in Stockholm, Sweden.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxharlemite.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/review-of-anthony-flews-there-is-a-god-how-the-worlds-most-notorious-atheist-changed-his-mind/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxharlemite.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I found your take on this book very interesting. I&#039;m aware there is some controversy as to how much of it is Flew&#039;s own work, but in the end I guess one has to take the book itself at face value, regardless of who actually wrote what part of it.

I&#039;d be really interested in what you think of &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkingmakesitso.wordpress.com/2009/01/24/another-flew-over-the-cuckoo%e2%80%99s-nest-1/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Another Flew over the cuckoo&#039;s nest&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks,
Chris Lawrence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I found your take on this book very interesting. I&#8217;m aware there is some controversy as to how much of it is Flew&#8217;s own work, but in the end I guess one has to take the book itself at face value, regardless of who actually wrote what part of it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be really interested in what you think of <a href="http://thinkingmakesitso.wordpress.com/2009/01/24/another-flew-over-the-cuckoo%e2%80%99s-nest-1/" rel="nofollow">Another Flew over the cuckoo&#8217;s nest</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris Lawrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrfuddyduddy</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxharlemite.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/review-of-anthony-flews-there-is-a-god-how-the-worlds-most-notorious-atheist-changed-his-mind/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>mrfuddyduddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxharlemite.wordpress.com/?p=26#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Even as a Christian I would be somewhat sceptical of Anthony Flew&#039;s &#039;conversion&#039;. You can view a couple of recent interviews on youtube where he attempts to explain his thought process. It is painful viewing. He is clearly gripped by some form of dementia. This seems to be the obvious line of attack for Dawkins and co., and they duly oblige in this regard - even arguing that he has been hijacked and manipulated by Christians. Who&#039;s to say? But I would be cautious about shouting this from the rooftops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as a Christian I would be somewhat sceptical of Anthony Flew&#8217;s &#8216;conversion&#8217;. You can view a couple of recent interviews on youtube where he attempts to explain his thought process. It is painful viewing. He is clearly gripped by some form of dementia. This seems to be the obvious line of attack for Dawkins and co., and they duly oblige in this regard &#8211; even arguing that he has been hijacked and manipulated by Christians. Who&#8217;s to say? But I would be cautious about shouting this from the rooftops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
